From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrell v. Cortez

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 17, 2024
5:23-cv-02648-SHK (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-02648-SHK

04-17-2024

Cameron Harrell v. Wendy Cortez, et al.


Present: The Honorable Shashi H. Kewalramani, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On December 29, 2023, Plaintiff Cameron Harrell (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint (“Complaint” or “Compl.”) in this Court. Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 1, Compl. The case was randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani under the Direct Assignment of Civil Cases to Magistrate Judges Program in accordance with General Order 12-02. On January 3, 2024, the Court Clerk issued a summons to Defendants (“Summons”). ECF No. 6. Plaintiff's proof of service was due on or before March 28, 2024.

To date, Plaintiff has failed to file any proof of service or request an extension of time to serve the Defendants. Therefore, because Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a proof of service of the Summons and Complaint, the Court is unable to determine the last date the parties have to file a statement of consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than April 24, 2024 why this Court should not recommend that the action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff may discharge this Order by filing a proof of service.

The parties are reminded that, for the above-entitled case to proceed with the assigned Magistrate Judge, they must file and serve joint or separate Consent form(s), indicating whether each party consents to have a Magistrate Judge proceed over this case. Plaintiff must file the Consent form within forty-two (42) days after service of the Summons and Complaint upon the first-served defendant. Each Defendant must file the Consent form within forty-two (42) days after service of the Summons and Complaint upon that Defendant. If one or both parties fails to consent to the case proceeding before the assigned Magistrate Judge within the prescribed time, the case automatically will be re-assigned.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harrell v. Cortez

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 17, 2024
5:23-cv-02648-SHK (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Harrell v. Cortez

Case Details

Full title:Cameron Harrell v. Wendy Cortez, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 17, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-02648-SHK (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)