From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrell v. Chappius

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 30, 2020
17 CIVIL 758 (LAP)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)

Opinion

17 CIVIL 758 (LAP)(SN)

11-30-2020

JAMES HARRELL, Petitioner, v. PAUL CHAPPIUS, JR., Respondent.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated November 25, 2020, and on January 6, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn issued a thorough Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court deny Petitioner James Harrell's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in its entirety. The parties were given fourteen days to file objections to the Report and Recommendation; no objections have been filed. When no objections to a Report and Recommendation are timely made, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record. Urena v. New York, 160 F. Supp. 2d 606, 609-10 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (quoting Nelson v. Smith, 618 F. Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)). The Court has reviewed the record and the Report and Recommendation for clear error and, finding none, Magistrate Judge Netburn's Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety as the opinion of the Court. Mr. Harrell's habeas corpus petition is therefore DENIED. Finding that Mr. Harrell has not demonstrated a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Dated: New York, New York

November 30, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Harrell v. Chappius

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 30, 2020
17 CIVIL 758 (LAP)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Harrell v. Chappius

Case Details

Full title:JAMES HARRELL, Petitioner, v. PAUL CHAPPIUS, JR., Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 30, 2020

Citations

17 CIVIL 758 (LAP)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)