From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. State Board of Pardons Paroles

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 25, 1990
390 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. 1990)

Opinion

S90A0624.

DECIDED APRIL 25, 1990.

Mandamus. Baldwin Superior Court. Before Judge Parrott.

Jimmie Louis Harper, pro se. Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Neal B. Childers, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.


Petitioner filed this action for mandamus against the State Board of Pardons and Paroles (Board), and its Chairman, seeking an order requiring them to recompute his sentences resulting from his convictions as an habitual violator. The petitioner maintained that the respondents had erred in calculating the time he was required to serve, and that he was entitled to be released from custody. At the time of the hearing of this case the petitioner had been released from custody. The trial court dismissed the petition for mandamus and this appeal followed.

The trial court correctly dismissed the petition for mandamus. The duty to award credit for time served lies with the Department of Corrections, not the Board of Pardons Paroles. Casario v. State, 169 Ga. 515 ( 313 S.E.2d 772) (1984); OCGA § 17-10-12. Therefore neither the Board nor its Chairman is a party against which mandamus will lie in this case.

Further mandamus lies against an official to require the performance of a clear legal duty. The writ of mandamus does not reach the office, but is a personal action against the official. Crow v. McCallum, 215 Ga. 692 ( 113 S.E.2d 203) (1960); OCGA § 9-6-20.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

DECIDED APRIL 25, 1990.


Summaries of

Harper v. State Board of Pardons Paroles

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 25, 1990
390 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. 1990)
Case details for

Harper v. State Board of Pardons Paroles

Case Details

Full title:HARPER v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS PAROLES et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Apr 25, 1990

Citations

390 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. 1990)
390 S.E.2d 592

Citing Cases

Carson v. Brown

" Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's dismissal of Carson's petition for mandamus against Brown and…

HCA Health Services, Inc. v. Roach

The trial court correctly noted that mandamus is a personal action against a public officer, not against the…