From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 12, 2002
831 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 1D02-3235.

Opinion filed December 12, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. Robert M. Foster, Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, and Giselle Lylen Rivera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The appellant challenges the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The appellant claims that the trial court erred when it imposed a habitual offender sentence on him because he did not receive a sentence for one of the prior convictions that were used as predicate felonies until after he had committed the instant offense. This claim is facially sufficient. To be properly habitualized, a defendant must have received a sentence for any prior felony upon which the state wishes to predicate habitualization before the defendant committed the instant offense for which habitualization is sought. See § 775.084(5), Fla. Stat. (1999). The trial court failed to attach any record portions that conclusively refute the appellant's claim. Therefore, we reverse and remand with instructions to the trial court to either support its summary denial with record attachments, or grant an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAVIS, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ. CONCUR.


Summaries of

Harper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 12, 2002
831 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Harper v. State

Case Details

Full title:HANK D. HARPER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 12, 2002

Citations

831 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)