From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. Jenkin

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jul 1, 1999
179 F.3d 1311 (11th Cir. 1999)

Summary

holding that filing of an untimely grievance does not properly exhaust a prisoner's administrative remedies

Summary of this case from O'Brien v. Seay

Opinion

No. 98-8813 Non-Argument Calendar

DECIDED July 1, 1999

Charles Harper, Trion, GA, pro se.

John C. Jones, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, D.C. Docket No. CV-698-11.

Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.


Section 1997e(a) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) provides that "[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § ] 1983 . . ., or any other federal law, by a prisoner confined in any . . . prison . . . until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted." 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). This provision applies in this case because the prisoner, the appellant, filed his complaint after the PLRA's effective date.

Appellant is an inmate in the Georgia state prison system. He seeks both monetary and injunctive relief on the ground that appellees, or one of them, violated his Eighth (and Fourteenth) Amendment right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment by refusing him needed medical treatment. Because appellant seeks such relief, section 1997e(a) required that he exhaust his administrative remedies before bringing suit.

Appellant has invoked the prison system's administrative process; he has done so by filing a grievance. His grievance has been denied, however, because it was untimely. Appellant could appeal such denial (within the prison system); he contends, however, that appeal would not be heard (because his grievance was untimely). Given this circumstance, his argument continues, he has exhausted his administrative remedies and, thus, the PLRA's exhaustion requirement. We disagree.

As the district court noted in disposing of this case, Georgia State Prison Inmate Grievance Procedure No. 503.1 allows the grievance coordinator to waive the time period for filing a grievance if "good cause" is shown. Since appellant has not sought leave to file an out-of-time grievance, he cannot be considered to have exhausted his administrative remedies. If we were to accept appellant's position — that the filing of an untimely grievance exhausts an inmate's administrative remedies — inmates, such as appellant, could ignore the PLRA's exhaustion requirement and still gain access to federal court merely by filing an untimely grievance.

In sum, we affirm the district court's dismissal of appellant's complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Harper v. Jenkin

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jul 1, 1999
179 F.3d 1311 (11th Cir. 1999)

holding that filing of an untimely grievance does not properly exhaust a prisoner's administrative remedies

Summary of this case from O'Brien v. Seay

holding that a prisoner did not exhaust available administrative remedies where he filed an untimely grievance without seeking leave, and failed to appeal the denial of his grievance

Summary of this case from Mason v. Bridger

holding that a prisoner who declined to appeal an untimely grievance failed to exhaust his administrative remedies

Summary of this case from Abram v. Leu

holding that a prisoner did not exhaust available administrative remedies where he filed an untimely grievance without seeking leave, and failed to appeal the denial of his grievance

Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Sloan

holding that a prisoner did not exhaust available administrative remedies where he filed an untimely grievance without seeking leave, and failed to appeal the denial of his grievance

Summary of this case from Davidson v. Allen

holding prisoner required to seek leave to file out-of-time grievance appeal prior to bringing suit

Summary of this case from Doe v. Wooten

holding prisoner required to seek leave to file out-of-time grievance appeal prior to bringing suit

Summary of this case from Arias v. Robinson

holding that plaintiff did not exhaust his administrative remedies because he filed an untimely grievance and had not requested leave to file out-of-time for good cause

Summary of this case from Ahmed v. Sromovski

finding that inmate had not exhausted his administrative remedies because his grievance was untimely and he had not sought leave to file an out-of-time grievance

Summary of this case from Maloch v. Pollard

finding that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies where procedure allowed for out-of-time grievances upon showing of good cause

Summary of this case from Dillard v. Jones

concluding that a prisoner who declined to appeal an untimely grievance failed to exhaust his administrative remedies

Summary of this case from Brown v. Jarriel

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Leal v. Georgia Department of Corrections

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Howard v. Welch

affirming dismissal of prisoner's complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies under the PLRA

Summary of this case from United States v. Alomar-Baello

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Ellis v. Henline

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Jarrard v. Brazier

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Corpa v. Baxley

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Toles v. Olson

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Dates v. Wilson

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Butler v. Colly

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Foster v. Meeks

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Lewis v. Houston Cnty. Sheriff

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Presley v. Dunn

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Berry v. Jones

affirming dismissal of prisoner's civil suit for failure to satisfy the mandatory exhaustion requirements of § 1997e

Summary of this case from Lee v. Corr. Med. Servs.
Case details for

Harper v. Jenkin

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES HARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DR. JENKIN, TOMMY REDDISH, LOUISE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jul 1, 1999

Citations

179 F.3d 1311 (11th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Woolum

In Wright v. Morris, one prisoner filed an initial grievance, but then failed to appeal the denial of this…

Strole v. Coats

This means that "until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted," a prisoner is precluded…