From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haroco Company v. National Surety Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1954
283 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

May 11, 1954.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.


In the absence of a showing of fraud or collusion the compensated surety is liable for the judgment recovered in the action in accordance with the terms of its bond. However, the judgment is "only prima facie evidence against the surety" ( Brescia Constr. Co. v. Walart Constr. Co., 245 App. Div. 105, 108). It appears from the record that $500 of the amount of the judgment recovered does not stem from a liability owed by the principal to the plaintiff, but on the contrary relates to a liability to the codefendant in the action in which the undertaking was filed. Accordingly, the judgment should be modified by reducing it to the sum of $9,500, with leave to the codefendant in said action to apply for such relief as he may be advised, without costs to either side.

Dore, J.P., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with the opinion herein and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs to either side. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Haroco Company v. National Surety Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1954
283 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Haroco Company v. National Surety Corporation

Case Details

Full title:HAROCO COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 11, 1954

Citations

283 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)