From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harnig v. Valleycrest Landscape Maintanence, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 6, 2012
Case No: 8:12-cv-670-T-30MAP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 8:12-cv-670-T-30MAP

11-06-2012

RICHARD HARNIG, Plaintiff, v. VALLEYCREST LANDSCAPE MAINTANENCE, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

The Court has been advised via a Mediation Report (Dkt. #13) that the above-styled action has been settled. Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 3.08(b), M.D.Fla, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause shown. After that 60-day period, however, dismissal shall be with prejudice. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 6th day of November, 2012.

_______________

JAMES S. MOODY, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
Counsel/Parties of Record


Summaries of

Harnig v. Valleycrest Landscape Maintanence, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 6, 2012
Case No: 8:12-cv-670-T-30MAP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Harnig v. Valleycrest Landscape Maintanence, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD HARNIG, Plaintiff, v. VALLEYCREST LANDSCAPE MAINTANENCE, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 6, 2012

Citations

Case No: 8:12-cv-670-T-30MAP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 6, 2012)