From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harmston v. C. I. R

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 23, 1976
528 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1976)

Opinion

No. 74-1677.

January 23, 1976.

William P. Irwin, of Irwin Thuesen, Fresno, Cal., for petitioners-appellants.

Richard M. Roberts, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Gary R. Allen, John G. Manning, Gilbert T. Andrews, Attys., Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the Tax Court.

Before KOELSCH and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.

The Honorable William J. Jameson, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.


OPINION


The matter is here on petition of Gordon J. Harmston and Alice C. Harmston, his wife, to review a decision of the United States Tax Court sustaining the Commissioner's determination of deficiencies in petitioners' income taxes for the calendar years 1967, 1968 and 1969. The Tax Court opinion is reported in 61 T.C. 216 (1973).

The deficiencies stemmed from the Commissioner's conclusion that portions of the amounts paid by petitioners as vendees under separate but essentially similar contracts for the purchase of two orange groves, although characterized in the contracts as being for the vendor's management and care of the groves, in fact constituted nondeductible capital investment and hence were not deductible from petitioners' gross income.

Having thoroughly examined the matter, we hold that the conclusion of the Tax Court was correct, and we affirm on the basis of its opinion.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Harmston v. C. I. R

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 23, 1976
528 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1976)
Case details for

Harmston v. C. I. R

Case Details

Full title:GORDON J. HARMSTON AND ALICE C. HARMSTON, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 23, 1976

Citations

528 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Rothstein v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Petitioners in the instant cases arguably had even less of an equity interest in the employer corporation…

Rothstein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Petitioners in the instant cases arguably had even less of an equity interest in the employer corporation…