Harmouche v. Consulate Gen. of Qatar

1 Citing case

  1. Lewis v. United States

    Civil Action 17-1644-JWD-SDJ (M.D. La. Mar. 21, 2024)

    “A facial attack consists of a Rule 12(b)(1) motion unaccompanied by supporting evidence that challenges the court's jurisdiction based solely on the pleadings.” Harmouche v. Consulate Gen. of the State of Qatar, 313 F.Supp.3d 815, 819 (S.D. Tex. 2018) (citing Paterson, 644 F.2d at 523). In considering a “facial attack,” a court “is required merely to look to the sufficiency of the allegations in the complaint because they are presumed to be true.