Opinion
Case No. CV 09-2979-GW(VBKx)
09-26-2011
SANDRA J. HARMON, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JOHNSON & JOHNSON SALES AND LOGISTICS COMPANY; NEUTROGENA CORPORATION, and DOES 1-10, inclusive Defendants.
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP JOHN S. BATTENFELD, SBN 119513 LARRY M. LAWRENCE, SBN 232720 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP LARRY L. TURNER, Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Defendants JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JOHNSON & JOHNSON SALES AND LOGISTICS COMPANY, LLC; and NEUTROGENA CORPORATION
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
JOHN S. BATTENFELD, SBN 119513
LARRY M. LAWRENCE, SBN 232720
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
LARRY L. TURNER, Pro Hac Vice
Attorneys for Defendants
JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JOHNSON &
JOHNSON SALES AND LOGISTICS
COMPANY, LLC; and NEUTROGENA CORPORATION
Hon. George Wu
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
On July 7, August 4 and September 19, 2011, Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Sales and Logistics Company, LLC., and Neutrogena Corporation's (collectively "Defendants") Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication came on for hearing before this Court. On September 19, 2011, after considering the pleadings, all written and oral arguments and admissible evidence in support and in opposition thereto, the Court granted Defendants' motion in full, finding that no triable issue of material fact exists and that Defendants' are entitled to summary judgment as to the claims in Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint for Damages.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:
Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff Sandra J. Harmon. As the prevailing parties, Defendants shall be entitled to recover their costs.
HON. GEORGE H. WU
United States District Judge
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
LARRY L. TURNER
JOHN S. BATTENFELD
LARRY M. LAWRENCE
Larry M. Lawrence
Attorneys for Defendants