From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harmer v. Caudle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Aug 27, 2012
NO. 3-11-0985 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 27, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3-11-0985

08-27-2012

GRENDA RAY HARMER v. DON CAUDLE, et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court are two Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Docket Nos. 121 and 122) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket Nos. 126 and 127).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Reports and Recommendations, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Reports and Recommendations are adopted and approved.

Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Schofield, Hodge, Moran, Lester and Clark (Docket No. 66) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED. In addition, the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Caudle (Docket No. 63) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Caudle are DISMISSED.

This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge in accordance with the Court's prior Order (Docket No. 6).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Harmer v. Caudle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Aug 27, 2012
NO. 3-11-0985 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Harmer v. Caudle

Case Details

Full title:GRENDA RAY HARMER v. DON CAUDLE, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 27, 2012

Citations

NO. 3-11-0985 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 27, 2012)