From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harman v. Borah

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 2, 1999
733 A.2d 1267 (Pa. 1999)

Opinion

August 2, 1999.

Petition Nos. 20 and 26 ED Alloc. Dkt. 1999 for Allowance of Appeal from the Order and published opinion of the Superior Court.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 1999, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal at No. 020 and No. 026 Eastern District Alloc. Dkt. 1999 are GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Did the Superior Court err by creating a per se rule that a trial court judge commits reversible error, and has no discretion to deny a motion for a mistrial whenever he or she engages in an off-the record discussion with a witness in the presence of the jury?
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal at No. 020 and No. 026 Eastern District Alloc. Dkt. 1999 are to be consolidated for purposes of oral argument.


Summaries of

Harman v. Borah

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 2, 1999
733 A.2d 1267 (Pa. 1999)
Case details for

Harman v. Borah

Case Details

Full title:Robert D. HARMAN and Dorothy E. Harman on Behalf of Christopher HARMAN, a…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 2, 1999

Citations

733 A.2d 1267 (Pa. 1999)
733 A.2d 1267