From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harlan v. Pratt

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1875
50 Cal. 94 (Cal. 1875)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court, Third Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco.

         No transcript had been filed in the Supreme Court at the time the motion was made and decided.

         COUNSEL

          H. F. Crane, for the motion.

         Foot & Carter, contra.


         OPINION

         By the Court:

         The notice of appeal was filed on March 21, 1874, but was not served until the 23d of that month. Under the statute, as it stood at those periods, these steps did not operate an appeal. (Columbet v. Pacheco , 46 Cal. 650.) Upon the face of the record, no appeal appearing to have been taken, the motion to dismiss the appeal must be denied.

         So ordered.


Summaries of

Harlan v. Pratt

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1875
50 Cal. 94 (Cal. 1875)
Case details for

Harlan v. Pratt

Case Details

Full title:HARLAN v. PRATT

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1875

Citations

50 Cal. 94 (Cal. 1875)

Citing Cases

Trobock v. Caro

         The Municipal Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction, for the reasons: That a copy of the notice of…