From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harik v. Nat

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 27, 2007
219 F. App'x 325 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-2116.

Submitted: February 22, 2007.

Decided: February 27, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:06-cv-00056-JBF).

Vasyl Michael Harik, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Vasyl Michael Harik appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Harik's hostile work environment, discriminatory discharge, and retaliatory discharge claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harik v. NASA No. 4:06-cv-00056-JBF (D. Md. filed Aug. 16, 2006; entered Aug. 17, 2006). We deny Harik's motions to place the appeal in abeyance and to include new evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Harik v. Nat

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 27, 2007
219 F. App'x 325 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Harik v. Nat

Case Details

Full title:Vasyl Michael HARIK, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 2007

Citations

219 F. App'x 325 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Nisbett v. ReconArt, Inc.

Thus, although some courts have reserved judgement on the possibility that the duty of good faith and fair…

Chapman v. Asbury Auto. Grp., Inc.

The Nisbett court explained: "[A]lthough some courts have reserved judgement on the possibility that the duty…