From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hargett v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 30, 2011
CASE NO. CV 11-06168 DOC (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 11-06168 DOC (RZ)

09-30-2011

WESLEY M. HARGETT, Petitioner, v. M.D. BITER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS

By Order Requiring Response to Petition filed August 2, 2011, Respondent also was ordered to file a Motion to Dismiss within 30 days or an Answer within 45 days. The docket sheet shows that, as late as the date of this Order, Respondent has not filed its Motion to Dismiss or Answer. Respondent has failed to comply with the Court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that within 20 days , Respondent shall show cause in writing why he should not be sanctioned including but not limited to an order that he pay monetary sanctions for his failure to comply with the Court's orders. The filing of the Motion to Dismiss or Answer within 20 days, shall discharge the order to show cause.

RALPH ZAREFSKY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hargett v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 30, 2011
CASE NO. CV 11-06168 DOC (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Hargett v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:WESLEY M. HARGETT, Petitioner, v. M.D. BITER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 30, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV 11-06168 DOC (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)