From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harford v. Graves

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Aug 7, 1931
136 So. 620 (Fla. 1931)

Opinion

Decision filed August 7, 1931. Petition for rehearing denied September 14, 1931.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Volusia County; M. G. Rowe, Judge.

James M. Carson and W. Theo Woodward, for Plaintiff in Error;

Hull, Landis Whitehair and Scarlett, Jordan, Futch Fielding for Defendants in Error.


The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should not have been sustained. Cummings Machine Works v. Clark, 89 Fla. 383, 105 So. 100, Garsed v. Sugarman, 99 Fla. 191, 126 So. 157.

Final judgment on demurrer reversed for appropriate proceedings.

BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Harford v. Graves

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Aug 7, 1931
136 So. 620 (Fla. 1931)
Case details for

Harford v. Graves

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK A. HARFORD, Plaintiff in Error, vs. ELWOOD L. GRAVES, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Aug 7, 1931

Citations

136 So. 620 (Fla. 1931)
136 So. 620

Citing Cases

Patten v. Daoud

Appellants contend that the declaration is fatally defective because it fails to charge that the act…

Catlett v. Chestnut

It is sufficient to say in affirming the judgment rendered in the present case, that the cited authority of…