From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hare v. Simpson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
No. CIV S-12-0136 JAM GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

No. CIV S-12-0136 JAM GGH PS

01-24-2013

GRAYSON L. HARE, JR., Plaintiff, v. SHIRLEY J. SIMPSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Defendants' motion to dismiss presently is calendared for hearing on January 31, 2013, as is plaintiff's motion to strike. Having reviewed the record, the court has determined that oral argument would not be of material assistance in determining the pending motions. Accordingly, the court will not entertain oral argument, and will determine the motions on the record, including the briefing in support of and in opposition to the pending motions. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The January 31, 2013 hearing on the motion to motion to dismiss and motion to strike, filed November 30, 2012 and December 20, 2012, respectively, is vacated; and

2. The motions are submitted on the record.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hare v. Simpson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
No. CIV S-12-0136 JAM GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Hare v. Simpson

Case Details

Full title:GRAYSON L. HARE, JR., Plaintiff, v. SHIRLEY J. SIMPSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

No. CIV S-12-0136 JAM GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)