From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hare v. City of Los Anegles

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 5, 2024
2:21-cv-00336-DDP-KSx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2024)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00336-DDP-KSx

01-05-2024

VICTORIA HARE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, LAPD OFFICER AHN #40237, LAPD OFFICER ALBIZURES #42646, LAPD SGT. STERLING; and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, Defendants.


Hon. Mag. Karen L. Stevenson

ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION

HONORABLE DEAN D. PREGERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Based on the stipulation of the parties and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. All parties are to bear their own costs and attorney's fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hare v. City of Los Anegles

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 5, 2024
2:21-cv-00336-DDP-KSx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Hare v. City of Los Anegles

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA HARE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, LAPD…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 5, 2024

Citations

2:21-cv-00336-DDP-KSx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2024)