From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardy v. Osinowo

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Oct 17, 2011
3:10CV00204JMM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

3:10CV00204JMM.

October 17, 2011


ORDER


Pending is Defendants' motion in limine to exclude testimony relating to Defendant Osinowo not wearing shoes. (Docket # 127). Plaintiff has filed a response. For good cause shown, Defendants' motion is GRANTED. Defendants' objections to testimony relating to Osinowo not wearing shoes are sustained.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hardy v. Osinowo

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Oct 17, 2011
3:10CV00204JMM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Hardy v. Osinowo

Case Details

Full title:DEMETRIUS HARDY PLAINTIFF v. OLUSEYI T. OSINOWO; ARMSTRONG TRANSFER AND…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

3:10CV00204JMM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 17, 2011)