From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harding v. TransForce, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 29, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cv-244 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-244

04-29-2013

NORA HARDING, Plaintiff, v. TRANSFORCE, INC., et al., Defendants.


JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 64), in which she asks this Court to reconsider its Order granting as unopposed Defendants' Motion to Compel. This Court prefers to decide issues on their merits, and therefore, shall permit Plaintiff to file her memorandum in opposition out of rule. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file Document Number 64 as Plaintiff‘s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 62). The Court will in due course consider Defendants' Motion to Compel. (Doc. No. 62.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

EDMUND A. SARGUS , JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Harding v. TransForce, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 29, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cv-244 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Harding v. TransForce, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NORA HARDING, Plaintiff, v. TRANSFORCE, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 29, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-244 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 29, 2013)