From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO .
Dec 20, 2016
507 S.W.3d 618 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. ED 103901

12-20-2016

Terry D. HARDIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff/Appellant Colette E. Neuner, Jefferson City, MO, for Defendant/Respondent


Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff/Appellant

Colette E. Neuner, Jefferson City, MO, for Defendant/Respondent

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry D. Hardin ("Movant") appeals the denial of his amended Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous, as the record clearly refutes Movant's claim of ineffective assistance of plea counsel.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hardin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO .
Dec 20, 2016
507 S.W.3d 618 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Hardin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Terry D. HARDIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO .

Date published: Dec 20, 2016

Citations

507 S.W.3d 618 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)