From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardin v. Rowland

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Apr 4, 2022
1:17-cv-00097 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 4, 2022)

Opinion

1:17-cv-00097

04-04-2022

CORTEZ HARDIN, SR., Plaintiff, v. BUCKY ROWLAND, et al., Defendants.


FRENSLEY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which was filed on January 12, 2022. (Doc. No. 41). Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although the Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hardin v. Rowland

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Apr 4, 2022
1:17-cv-00097 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Hardin v. Rowland

Case Details

Full title:CORTEZ HARDIN, SR., Plaintiff, v. BUCKY ROWLAND, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division

Date published: Apr 4, 2022

Citations

1:17-cv-00097 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 4, 2022)