From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardin v. Rowland

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Jul 14, 2021
1:17-cv-00097 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

1:17-cv-00097

07-14-2021

CORTEZ L. HARDIN, SR., Plaintiff, v. BUCKY ROWLAND, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 37), which was filed on June 7, 2021. Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Jordan Barber and Darien Nagel (Doc. No. 34) be granted. The motion to dismiss and the Report and Recommendation were sent to Plaintiff's address of record; both were returned as undeliverable. (See Doc. Nos. 36, 38).

The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings were to be filed within fourteen days of service (Doc. No. 37 at 5). No objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 34) is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Hardin v. Rowland

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Jul 14, 2021
1:17-cv-00097 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Hardin v. Rowland

Case Details

Full title:CORTEZ L. HARDIN, SR., Plaintiff, v. BUCKY ROWLAND, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

1:17-cv-00097 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 14, 2021)