From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harden v. State

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Dec 19, 2006
Case No. 3:06-cv-349 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06-cv-349.

December 19, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #5), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on December 7, 2006, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations.


Summaries of

Harden v. State

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Dec 19, 2006
Case No. 3:06-cv-349 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2006)
Case details for

Harden v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES HARDEN, Petitioner, v. STATE OF OHIO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Dec 19, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:06-cv-349 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2006)