From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harbine v. Elsman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 19, 1926
156 N.E. 216 (Ohio 1926)

Opinion

No. 19881

Decided October 19, 1926.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Montgomery county.

Mr. John T. Harbine, Jr., and Mr. Frank H. Dean, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Herbert E. Kreitzer, for defendants in error.


It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE and ROBINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harbine v. Elsman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 19, 1926
156 N.E. 216 (Ohio 1926)
Case details for

Harbine v. Elsman

Case Details

Full title:HARBINE, JR. v. ELSMAN ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 19, 1926

Citations

156 N.E. 216 (Ohio 1926)
156 N.E. 216