From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hantman v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jun 6, 1925
236 P. 443 (Okla. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

No. A-4750.

Opinion Filed June 6, 1925.

Appeal from Municipal Criminal Court of City of Tulsa; G.E. Warren, Judge.

Nate Hantman was convicted of vagrancy, and appeals. Affirmed.

Jno. L. Ward, for plaintiff in error.


The plaintiff in error was convicted in the municipal criminal court of Tulsa on a charge of vagrancy, under section 1956, Comp. St. 1921. An appeal was filed in this court on June 28, 1923. No briefs have been filed by appellant as required by the rules of this court. If the matter is not of sufficient importance to appellant to present the contentions of error relied upon this court will not search the record for errors on which to reverse, but, where no fundamental error appears on the face of the record, will affirm the judgment of the lower court.

The case is affirmed.


Summaries of

Hantman v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jun 6, 1925
236 P. 443 (Okla. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Hantman v. State

Case Details

Full title:NATE HANTMAN v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 6, 1925

Citations

236 P. 443 (Okla. Crim. App. 1925)
31 Okla. Crim. 17