From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hansen v. Loomis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1988
137 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

February 8, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order entered July 16, 1987 is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered March 10, 1987, and the order dated March 23, 1987, respectively, are affirmed, and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Based on the facts of this case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint with prejudice and refusing to restore the case to the Trial Calendar. The plaintiff had been granted several adjournments by the trial court over a period of approximately one year. Moreover, prior to the last adjournment, the plaintiff was informed that no further adjournments would be granted. Despite this warning, the plaintiff was not ready to proceed on the final adjourned date. Mollen, P.J., Lawrence, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hansen v. Loomis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1988
137 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Hansen v. Loomis

Case Details

Full title:LORENTZ W. HANSEN, Appellant, v. SUSAN LOOMIS, Also Known as MRS. ROBERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 8, 1988

Citations

137 A.D.2d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Baldeo v. Choudhury

The petitioner's counsel made it clear that he would not be prepared to proceed with the hearing even if the…

Baldeo v. Choudhury

The petitioner's counsel made it clear that he would not be prepared to proceed with the hearing even if the…