From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hansen v. Dayton's

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 26, 2011
802 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. 2011)

Opinion

No. A11–0432.

2011-08-26

Jill E. HANSEN, Respondent/Cross–Appellant,v.DAYTON'S, n/k/a Macy's, Self–Insured, Relator/Cross–Respondent,andJohn G. Stark, M.D., P.A., Hennepin Faculty Associates, and RS Medical, Intervenors,andMedica Health Plans, Intervenor–Respondent.


Mark J. Freeman, Fitch, Johnson, Larson & Held, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent/cross-appellant.Timothy P. Jung, Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for relator/cross-respondent.M. Shannon Peterson, McCollum, Crowley, Moschet, Miller & Laak, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for intervenor-respondent.Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 2, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson

Associate Justice


Summaries of

Hansen v. Dayton's

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 26, 2011
802 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. 2011)
Case details for

Hansen v. Dayton's

Case Details

Full title:Jill E. HANSEN, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. DAYTON'S, n/k/a Macy's…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Aug 26, 2011

Citations

802 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. 2011)