From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hannigan v. Novak

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 28, 2017
396 P.3d 997 (Wash. 2017)

Opinion

NO. 94270-6

06-28-2017

Wesley R. HANNIGAN, Petitioner, v. Vit NOVAK, et ux., Respondents.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins, and Gordon McCloud, considered at its June 27, 2017, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file the petition for review is denied. Therefore, the petition for review is dismissed as untimely.

For the Court

/s/Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Hannigan v. Novak

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 28, 2017
396 P.3d 997 (Wash. 2017)
Case details for

Hannigan v. Novak

Case Details

Full title:Wesley R. HANNIGAN, Petitioner, v. Vit NOVAK, et ux., Respondents.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jun 28, 2017

Citations

396 P.3d 997 (Wash. 2017)
188 Wash. 2d 1016
188 Wn. 2d 1016