From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanneford Circus, Inc. v. Cabar Circus Promotions, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 7, 1994
201 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 7, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly awarded the plaintiff summary judgment. It is clear from the facts alleged that the defendant did not procure the right to present a circus at the Westchester County Center for 1990 and assign that right to the plaintiff, as was required by the contract at issue. Further, the court properly dismissed the defendant's various counter-claims, as none were supported by sufficient evidentiary facts (see, Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 N.Y.2d 395). We disagree with the defendant that the failure to present evidentiary facts should be excused pursuant to CPLR 3212 (f) on the ground that the facts needed are exclusively within the knowledge of the plaintiff. Here, the action was pending for over a year before the motion for summary judgment was made, and the defendant failed to avail itself of any opportunities to obtain disclosure of such facts (see, Stevens v. Hilmy, 185 A.D.2d 840; Yu v. Forero, 184 A.D.2d 506; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac ¶ 3212.18). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hanneford Circus, Inc. v. Cabar Circus Promotions, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 7, 1994
201 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Hanneford Circus, Inc. v. Cabar Circus Promotions, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:HANNEFORD CIRCUS, INC., Respondent, v. CABAR CIRCUS PROMOTIONS, LIMITED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 7, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 128

Citing Cases

Snyder v. Reveo Inc.

Accordingly, the matter was set down for a pre-trial conference on June 18, 2008 and adjourned to June 27,…

Moukarzel v. Montefiore Medical Center

( Board of Curators v Horowitz, 435 US 78, 90; see also, Matter of Sofair v State Univ. of N. Y. Upstate Med.…