From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hannaford v. Mann

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 2, 2012
304 Conn. 929 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-2

Michael HANNAFORD, Administrator (Estate of Ruth Goryn) v. David MANN et al.

Peter M. Van Dyke, Hartford, in support of the petition. William J. Sweeney, Jr., New Britain, in opposition.


Peter M. Van Dyke, Hartford, in support of the petition. William J. Sweeney, Jr., New Britain, in opposition.

The named defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 265, 38 A.3d 1239, is denied.


Summaries of

Hannaford v. Mann

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 2, 2012
304 Conn. 929 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

Hannaford v. Mann

Case Details

Full title:Michael HANNAFORD, Administrator (Estate of Ruth Goryn) v. David MANN et…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 2, 2012

Citations

304 Conn. 929 (Conn. 2012)
42 A.3d 391

Citing Cases

Homebridge Fin. Servs. v. Jakubiec

(Citation omitted.) Hannaford v. Mann, 134 Conn. App. 265, 276, 38 A.3d 1239, cert. denied, 304 Conn. 929, 42…

Dunn v. Ne. Helicopters Flight Servs.

Although the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not ordinarily a final judgment and, thus, not…