From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanna v. Pettiford

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Aug 1, 2006
Case No. 5:06cv65/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Aug. 1, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 5:06cv65/MCR/MD.

August 1, 2006


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated July 17, 2006. The petitioner previously has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and any objections thereto timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petitioner's motion for judgment on the pleading and/or request for a hearing (doc. 15) is DENIED.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is transferred back to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Western Division.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hanna v. Pettiford

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Aug 1, 2006
Case No. 5:06cv65/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Aug. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Hanna v. Pettiford

Case Details

Full title:LIONEL HANNA, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL PETTIFORD, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Aug 1, 2006

Citations

Case No. 5:06cv65/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Aug. 1, 2006)

Citing Cases

Plunkett v. Warden, FCI Tallahassee

His subsequent prison transfer did not, in and of itself, deprive this Court of jurisdiction. SeeRumsfeld v.…

Olson v. English

See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 441 (2004) ("Thus, Endo stands for the important but limited…