From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hankins v. the State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 6, 1917
74 So. 400 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)

Opinion

Decided February 6, 1917.

APPEAL from Colbert Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. C.P. ALMON.

James Jackson, for appellant. W.L. MARTIN, Attorney General, for the State.



Andrew Hankins was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. Affirmed.


The defendant was indicted for the violation of the prohibition law, in that he sold, offered for sale, kept for sale, or otherwise disposed of, spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors, contrary to law, etc. To this indictment the defendant interposed a plea of not guilty; but after the state had introduced its evidence and had made out its case as required by law, the defendant obtained permission of the court to withdraw his plea of not guilty, and thereupon entered a plea of guilty as charged in the indictment.

The only assignment of error disclosed by the record is the court's refusal to give at request of the defendant, the following written charge:

"Gentlemen of the jury, it is a principle of law that justice should be tempered in mercy."

There was no error in refusing this charge, as it embodies no proposition of law and is argumentative, and the court was under no duty to give it.

Finding no error, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hankins v. the State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 6, 1917
74 So. 400 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
Case details for

Hankins v. the State

Case Details

Full title:Hankins v. The State. Violating Prohibition Law

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 6, 1917

Citations

74 So. 400 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
74 So. 400