From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hankins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 31, 1996
677 So. 2d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-1128.

July 31, 1996.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Robert B. Carney, Judge; L.T. Case No. 93-13257CFA02.

Lucious Hankins, Jr., Raiford, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William A. Spillias, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The trial court summarily denied appellant's motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Appellant alleged ineffective assistance of counsel based on trial counsel's failure to assert his speedy trial rights.

The trial court failed to attach those parts of the record that would conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief. Therefore, we reverse and remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to either conduct an evidentiary hearing or to attach those parts of the record showing that appellant is not entitled to relief. See Carter v. State, 632 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). See also Toliver v. State, 652 So.2d 1291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hankins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 31, 1996
677 So. 2d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Hankins v. State

Case Details

Full title:LUCIOUS HANKINS, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 31, 1996

Citations

677 So. 2d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

On remand, the trial court should either attach portions of the record that conclusively refute Williams's…

Hankins v. State

We reversed and remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing. Hankins v. State, 677 So.2d 112 (Fla. 4th DCA…