Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-013-RLV-DCK
12-30-2011
ORDER
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiff's "Motion For Attorney Fees" (Document No. 25) filed December 29, 2011. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the motion, without prejudice to re-file.
Plaintiff's motion does not appear to indicate that the requirement of consultation has been met pursuant to Local Rule 7.1 (B).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion For Attorney Fees" (Document No. 25) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
___________
David C. Keesler
United States Magistrate Judge