From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Handcock v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 24, 2014
Case No. C-3:12-cv-096 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 24, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. C-3:12-cv-096

02-24-2014

JAMES HANDCOCK Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional Institution Respondent.


Judge Thomas M. Rose

Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING HANDCOCK'S OBJECTIONS

(Doc. #9) TO THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. #8) IN ITS

ENTIRETY; DISMISSING HANDCOCK'S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS WITH PREJUDICE; DENYING LEAVE TO APPEAL

IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ANY REQUESTED CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY AND TERMINATING THIS CASE

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to pro se Petitioner James Handcock's ("Handcock's") Objections (doc. #9) to Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington's Report and Recommendations (doc. #8). Chief Magistrate Judge Ovington's Report and Recommendations recommends that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Handcock be dismissed with prejudice, that Handcock be denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and that any requested certificate of appealability be denied..

As required by 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 72(b), the District Judge has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Handcock's Objections to the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations are not well-taken, and they are hereby OVERRULED. The Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations is adopted in its entirety.

Handcock's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied with prejudice. Further, Handcock is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any requested certificate of appealability. Finally, the captioned cause is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Twenty-Fourth Day of February, 2014.

___________________

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
James Handcock at his last address of record


Summaries of

Handcock v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 24, 2014
Case No. C-3:12-cv-096 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Handcock v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES HANDCOCK Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional Institution…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Feb 24, 2014

Citations

Case No. C-3:12-cv-096 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 24, 2014)