From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hand v. Houk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS
Jan 21, 2014
Case No. 2:07-cv-846 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 21, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-846

01-21-2014

GERALD HAND, Petitioner, v. MARC HOUK, Warden, Respondent.


District Judge Sandra A. Beckwith

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

ENTRY

This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Respondent's Motion for Judgment Entry (Doc. No. 145). Respondent is concerned that there be a firm date from which to calculate Petitioner's time to appeal.

On June 6, 2011, while this case was pending before District Judge Beckwith on the merits, the Magistrate Judge entered an Order for Pre-judgment Briefing on Certificate of Appealability (Doc. No. 107) which explained that Rules Governing § 2254 Cases had been amended to require that a decision on appealability be made in any "final order adverse to the applicant." In order to comply with that new rule, the Magistrate Judge had to change his practice in capital habeas of waiting to make a recommendation on appealability until after the District Judge had decided the merits. To accomplish compliance in this case, where the Report and Recommendations on the merits had already been filed, Petitioner was ordered to brief that question prior to judgment. Id. In a later entries, Petitioner's time to file a motion for certificate of appealability was extended such that the Motion for Certificate of Appealability was eventually timely filed November 21, 2013 (Doc. No. 142). The Report and Recommendations on that Motion was filed January 3, 2014 (Doc. No. 144); any objections are due by January 21, 2014.

It is contemplated by the Magistrate Judge that Judge Beckwith will enter a final judgment in this case when she rules on the Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Because of Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, a judgment entry at this point would be premature. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 54.

Respondent's Motion for Judgment Entry is DENIED.

Michael R. Merz

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Hand v. Houk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS
Jan 21, 2014
Case No. 2:07-cv-846 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 21, 2014)
Case details for

Hand v. Houk

Case Details

Full title:GERALD HAND, Petitioner, v. MARC HOUK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS

Date published: Jan 21, 2014

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-846 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 21, 2014)