From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hampton v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division
May 12, 2008
NO. 2:00CR094-WAP (N.D. Miss. May. 12, 2008)

Opinion

NO. 2:00CR094-WAP.

May 12, 2008


ORDER


Presently before the court are two motions by Petitioner. One is a self-styled motion to correct the record which is related to a motion which has previously been denied. The motion to correct the record (docket entry 324) is DENIED. The second motion is for a stay of the proceedings until his pending motion for retroactive application of the sentencing guidelines to crack cocaine offenses has been resolved. At a later date, the court will determine if Hampton is entitled to benefit from the amended guidelines. Thus, the motion to stay (docket entry 329) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hampton v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division
May 12, 2008
NO. 2:00CR094-WAP (N.D. Miss. May. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Hampton v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE HAMPTON, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division

Date published: May 12, 2008

Citations

NO. 2:00CR094-WAP (N.D. Miss. May. 12, 2008)