From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hampton v. Town of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 2002
298 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-07430

Argued September 17, 2002.

October 28, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated June 25, 2001, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Daniel M. Tanenbaum, Great Neck, N.Y., for appellant.

Bonnie P. Chaikin, Town Attorney, Manhasset, N.Y. (Linda B. Zuech of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A municipality which has enacted a prior written notice statute may not be subjected to liability for personal injuries resulting from an improperly-maintained sidewalk, unless it received actual written notice of the dangerous condition, its affirmative act of negligence proximately caused the accident, or a special use confers a special benefit to the municipality (see Amabile v. City of Buffalo, 93 N.Y.2d 471). Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the "special letter" dated May 22, 1990, did not constitute prior written notice to satisfy Town Code of the Town of North Hempstead § 26-1, as it failed to identify the particular defect which needed repair (see Camenson v. Town of North Hempstead, 298 A.D.2d 543 [decided herewith]; James v. City of New Rochelle, 282 A.D.2d 503; Roth v. Town of N. Hempstead, 273 A.D.2d 215). Moreover, there is no evidence that the defendant created the condition complained of through any affirmative act of negligence, or that a special use conferred a special benefit upon the defendant (see Roth v. Town of N. Hempstead, supra).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., McGINITY, LUCIANO and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hampton v. Town of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 2002
298 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Hampton v. Town of North Hempstead

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH HAMPTON, appellant, v. TOWN OF NORTH HEMPSTEAD, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 675

Citing Cases

Winsche v. Town of North Hempstead

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. The defendant Town of North Hempstead demonstrated its…

Skaats v. Town of Huntington, Cnty.

With regard to the Town's cross motion, it is well settled that where a municipal defendant has enacted a…