From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hampton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 9, 1977
351 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-924.

November 9, 1977.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Henry Prettyman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


AFFIRMED. See State v. Heath, 343 So.2d 13 (Fla. 1977).

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially, with opinion.


This appeal involves the question presented in Pace v. State, 350 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA, Opinion filed June 24, 1977), in which I dissented. See also dissent upon denial of rehearing, Opinion filed October 11, 1977. The rule is now established that the trial court may impose the restriction discussed in Pace, supra. Therefore, I concur in the result here but do not recede from my opinion in that dissent.


Summaries of

Hampton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 9, 1977
351 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Hampton v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE HAMPTON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 9, 1977

Citations

351 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Isaacs v. State

We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. The case was initially consolidated with Pace v.…