From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammonds v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Dec 6, 2006
No. 04-05-00528-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 6, 2006)

Opinion

No. 04-05-00528-CR.

December 6, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas, Trial Court No. 04-11-0248-CRA, Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding.

Sitting: ALMA L. LÓPEZ, Chief Justice CATHERINE STONE, Justice KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


AFFIRMED Marilyn Hammonds was charged with possession of less than one gram of cocaine. Hammonds was found guilty of the alleged offense after a jury trial, and she was sentenced to two years imprisonment, probated for five years. We affirm. Hammonds's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to Hammonds, who was advised of her right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.).


Summaries of

Hammonds v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Dec 6, 2006
No. 04-05-00528-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 6, 2006)
Case details for

Hammonds v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARILYN HAMMONDS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Dec 6, 2006

Citations

No. 04-05-00528-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 6, 2006)