From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammond v. Paterson

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 28, 1941
17 A.2d 549 (N.J. 1941)

Opinion

Submitted October 25, 1940 —

Decided January 28, 1941.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 123 N.J.L. 553.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed, solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

For the appellant, Aaron Heller.

For the defendants, George Surosky and George Dimond.


The judgment herein is affirmed, by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, BODINE, PORTER, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 6.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, DONGES, PERSKIE, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 6.


Summaries of

Hammond v. Paterson

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 28, 1941
17 A.2d 549 (N.J. 1941)
Case details for

Hammond v. Paterson

Case Details

Full title:HARRY HAMMOND, PROSECUTOR, v. BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PATERSON…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 28, 1941

Citations

17 A.2d 549 (N.J. 1941)
17 A.2d 549

Citing Cases

Ryerson v. City of Paterson

The "Ordinance to License and Regulate Junk Yards in the City of Paterson," as amended, does not reserve to…

Messina v. Mayor of Borough of Lodi

Let us allude to some contrastive cases. In Hammond v. Paterson, 123 N.J.L. 553 ( Sup. Ct. 1940), affirmed by…