From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammond v. Gansheimer

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 17, 2008
CASE NO. 5:06CV2339 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 17, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:06CV2339.

January 17, 2008


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by William Hammond ("Petitioner"), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. # 1).

On November 9, 2006, this case was automatically referred to Magistrate Judge James S. Gallas for preparation of a Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and LR 72.1. (Dkt. # 2). On December 21, 2007, the Magistrate issued a report and recommendation, recommending that the Court deny the instant petition because the petition is barred by the statute of limitations established by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A). (Dkt. # 10).

FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within ten (10) days after service, but Petitioner has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Petitioner is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge de novo, and finds that it is well-supported. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Gallas (Dkt. # 10) is hereby ADOPTED, and Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hammond v. Gansheimer

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 17, 2008
CASE NO. 5:06CV2339 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Hammond v. Gansheimer

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM HAMMOND, PLAINTIFF, v. RICHARD GANSHEIMER, Warden, DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 17, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 5:06CV2339 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 17, 2008)

Citing Cases

Sanders v. Bobby

Other district courts have also held that delayed appeals are not part of the direct appeal process under 28…

Craft v. Moore

. . . Other district courts have also held that delayed appeals are not part of the direct appeal process…