From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammond v. Bourklund

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1901
66 App. Div. 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)

Opinion

November Term, 1901.


The court declines to consider the appeal in this case because the record is imperfect. 1. The affidavit of Warner F. Miller and the notice of motion for judgment of foreclosure noted in the order as having been read on the motion are not printed in the record. 2. The affidavits of James C. Beecher, Jacob T. Smith, Allison K. Hume, which are printed in the record, are not recited in the order as having been read on the motion. 3. The order should be resettled so as to show what papers were used before the judge, and such papers should be printed in the record. All concurred.


Summaries of

Hammond v. Bourklund

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1901
66 App. Div. 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)
Case details for

Hammond v. Bourklund

Case Details

Full title:Mary R. Hammond, Plaintiff, v. John Bourklund and Others, Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1901

Citations

66 App. Div. 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)