From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammer v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 3, 2017
No. 73903 (Nev. Nov. 3, 2017)

Opinion

No. 73903

11-03-2017

DEREK HAMMER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a purported decision denying a "motion of defendant to inspect all evidence favorable to him." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Stefany Miley, Judge.

Our review of this appeal reveals jurisdictional defects. Specifically, no statute or court rule permits an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to inspect all evidence. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Further, review of the district court minutes and docket entries indicate that no such order was entered. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

/s/_________, J.

Douglas /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge

Derek Hammer

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Hammer v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 3, 2017
No. 73903 (Nev. Nov. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Hammer v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEREK HAMMER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 3, 2017

Citations

No. 73903 (Nev. Nov. 3, 2017)