From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hammer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 6, 2000
768 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D99-3832.

Opinion filed September 6, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Joseph G. Donahey, Jr., Judge.

Joseph F. McDermott of McDermott Law Firm, St. Pete Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


In this belated appeal, Beverly Jean Hammer appeals her conviction for vehicular homicide in violation of section 782.071, Florida Statutes (1995), and raises three issues on appeal. We agree with her argument that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, and we reverse on that ground. We do not address the other issues on appeal, which are rendered moot by our decision today.

We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and reach the inescapable conclusion that the only evidence supporting the jury's verdict came from prior inconsistent statements, which were introduced as impeachment evidence. Such evidence, standing alone, is not sufficient to support a conviction of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See, e.g., Beckford v. State, 748 So.2d 284 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Andreu v. State, 696 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge Ms. Hammer.

NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Hammer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 6, 2000
768 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Hammer v. State

Case Details

Full title:BEVERLY JEAN HAMMER, Appellant v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 6, 2000

Citations

768 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)