Opinion
DOCKET NO:1:13-CV-00041
08-08-2014
FLOYD HAMILTON III, et al. v. SHIVANI NEGI, et al.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK
JUDGMENT
For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after independent (de novo) review of the record including the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings and recommendations are correct under the applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for new (Doc. 29) trial is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 35) and motion to dismiss (Doc. 25) is GRANTED and the plaintiffs' fraud claim and the tort claims of Johnson, Odhams, Gray and Wade are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Alexandria, Louisiana on this 8th day of August, 2014.
/s/_________
JAMES T. TRIMBLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE