From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Damico

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 6, 2016
CIVIL ACTION 16-178-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Jun. 6, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 16-178-SDD-RLB

06-06-2016

RAYMOND HAMILTON (#900135020) v. THOMAS DAMICO, ET AL.


RULING

The Court, after carefully considering the Complaint, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated April 27, 2016, to which no objection has been filed, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

Rec. Doc. 1.

Rec. Doc. 6. --------

ACCORDINGLY, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any potential state law claims, and the Plaintiff's action shall be dismissed, with prejudice, as legally frivolous, and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana the 6 day of June, 2016.

/s/ _________

SHELLY D. DICK, DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Damico

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 6, 2016
CIVIL ACTION 16-178-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Jun. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Damico

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND HAMILTON (#900135020) v. THOMAS DAMICO, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jun 6, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 16-178-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Jun. 6, 2016)

Citing Cases

Garig v. Travis

And this Court has granted motions to dismiss based on Heck. See Martin v. Roy, No. 20-339, 2021 WL 1080933…