From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halousek v. Sacramento Cnty. Sheriff's Office

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 26, 2023
2:21-cv-02351-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02351-TLN-DB

06-26-2023

SHEILA HALOUSEK, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On April 5, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 5, 2023 (ECF No. 8) are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

3. This action is referred back to the magistrate judge for resolution of Plaintiff's pending motion for change of venue (ECF No. 10.)


Summaries of

Halousek v. Sacramento Cnty. Sheriff's Office

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 26, 2023
2:21-cv-02351-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Halousek v. Sacramento Cnty. Sheriff's Office

Case Details

Full title:SHEILA HALOUSEK, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND THE…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 26, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-02351-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2023)