From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halo Wireless, Inc. v. Tenn. Regulatory Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 23, 2012
NO. 3-12-0302 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 23, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3-12-0302

10-23-2012

HALO WIRELESS, INC. v. TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 67, to which no Objections have been timely filed, and a Motion for Order Regarding Proposed Dismissal filed by a Non-Party, Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc. (Docket No. 68).

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Plaintiff Halo Wireless, Inc. for failure to prosecute. Transcom's Motion (Docket No. 68) is granted, and nothing about this ruling shall bind or be dispositive of the rights of Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc. in Case No. 3-12-0679.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Halo Wireless, Inc. v. Tenn. Regulatory Auth.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 23, 2012
NO. 3-12-0302 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Halo Wireless, Inc. v. Tenn. Regulatory Auth.

Case Details

Full title:HALO WIRELESS, INC. v. TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

NO. 3-12-0302 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 23, 2012)